Comments on: The China Study http://rawfoodsos.com Navigating the sea towards better health. Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:11:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: GordonWayneWatts http://rawfoodsos.com/the-china-study/#comment-19688 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:28:24 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/#comment-19688 (RE: “”http://www.rawpaleodietforum.com/journals/lex%27s-journal/ I challenge.”") what u saying, GC?

That eating meat is better?

As I look at that link, it merely seems to say that less protein & more fat is better, not necessarily more animal fat, right?

I admit, I did not get a chance t ofully review your link (so ,y massessment may be incomplete).

But, in a nutshell, what are you suggesting here?

Thx,

– Gordon Wayne Watts
LAKELAND, Fla., U.S.A.

]]> By: GC http://rawfoodsos.com/the-china-study/#comment-19686 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:17:22 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/#comment-19686 http://www.rawpaleodietforum.com/journals/lex%27s-journal/

I challenge.

]]> By: GC http://rawfoodsos.com/the-china-study/#comment-19685 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:08:28 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/#comment-19685 I second that. Why ARE you here?

]]> By: GC http://rawfoodsos.com/the-china-study/#comment-19684 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:57:41 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/#comment-19684 And we all know that scientists are always right.

Aren’t they?

How about people named Lyle who ALSO do not back up what they say with hard data?

]]> By: Ancestral Health? Evolutionary Nutrition? Paleo Diet? WHAT IS ALL THE FUSS?! « Back It Up http://rawfoodsos.com/the-china-study/#comment-19677 Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:39:36 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/#comment-19677 [...] The China Study [...]

]]> By: A Researcher http://rawfoodsos.com/the-china-study/#comment-19584 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:10:38 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/#comment-19584 Joyce: I’m one of those biased ignormasouses with letters after my name and a few years in research re lifestyle prevention of disease who happens to practice a close to vegan diet because of common sense reinforced by research results. A recent trip to the doctor elicited this response – “I would not say it is non-existent, but it is very rare for me to see patients over the age of 65 on no medications at all. You are in excellent health.” Joyce, I think your response could have been a little more like you expect from those who disagree with you i.e. less like “a drunken rage”.

Might I also add that most of us researchers recognize that knowledge is progressive and what is touted as “fact” one day is recognized as error another and perhaps what replaces the error might not yet be understood as error by later discoveries.

Wrightio and you are right that Castelli did make that statement re high saturated fat intake etc. being inversely related to cholesterol levels in a letter. However, as a thorough examiner for truth, it would be wise to see what Castelli says as the years go by – and if he changes, are you going to call him a lier, a charlatan and a fraud because he changes his opinion as science unfolds?

Take a look at this quote from a 2001 article by Castelli, and then look at yourself and your own biases and do a little self-examination of your attitudes and emotional outburst, and quality of your research. .

Improvement in myocardial perfusion: The effects of vigorous, short-term cholesterol lowering have also
been investigated in hyperlipidemic patients with coronary artery disease and $50% stenosis in a major
coronary artery.26 Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 cholesterol-reducing regimens—an extremely
low-fat diet, totally fat-free parenteral nutrition, or a moderately low-fat diet plus a lipid-lowering drug
(lovastatin). After 90 days, positron emission tomography showed that myocardial perfusion abnormalities
had improved significantly, regardless of the regimen followed. Patients also had less angina and longer times on the modified Bruce protocol.26
Making practical sense of clinical trial data in decreasing cardiovascular risk. Castelli WP.
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Aug 16;88(4A):16F-20F.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=11520482%20

]]> By: Perfekthälsa » Blog Archive » ”Hur kan man veta” & ”Man levde ju inte” http://rawfoodsos.com/the-china-study/#comment-19581 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:38:31 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/#comment-19581 [...] av statistiker, läkare och andra forskare och här är troligtvis en av de bättre genomgångarna http://rawfoodsos.com/the-china-study/. För den som orkar ta sig igenom material framgår med all tydlighet att Dr. Campells studie [...]

]]> By: So Richard, How's the New Paleo 101 Book Going So Far? | Free The Animal http://rawfoodsos.com/the-china-study/#comment-19025 Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:41:28 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/#comment-19025 [...] was almost embarrassing to read, given the exhaustive nature of what that cute little smarty pants does. Red-faced & happy, I guess you could say. Relieved, [...]

]]> By: Ocean http://rawfoodsos.com/the-china-study/#comment-18318 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:41:35 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/#comment-18318 Just gotta say…..How many of these commenters are actually DurianRider himself?? Like Olof, Lyle etc. They all have a certain ring to them (idiocy) and Durianrider does have massive mental issues. He spends like 14 hrs a day on computers doing his life work- i.e. pretending to be someone else and starting arguements on paleo and other forums/blogs.
So yeah I guess what I’m saying is don’t worry so much about replying to the crap comments he posts as they are just rubbish. ro

]]> By: The Bible Is (NOT) A Diet Book - Part IV | http://rawfoodsos.com/the-china-study/#comment-17254 Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:40:23 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/#comment-17254 [...] less heart disease. Check out the best critique of The China Study I’ve seen by Denise Minger at Raw Food SOS here. (I have to add here that most researchers do not even give Campbell’s study their attention [...]

]]>