Comments on: The China Study: My Response to Campbell http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/07/16/the-china-study-my-response-to-campbell/ Navigating the sea towards better health. Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:11:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: cortesdiddy http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/07/16/the-china-study-my-response-to-campbell/#comment-19604 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:31:46 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/?p=404#comment-19604 You’re not being serious, are you?

]]> By: cortesdiddy http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/07/16/the-china-study-my-response-to-campbell/#comment-19571 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:13:21 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/?p=404#comment-19571 as they say on the internet these days,

ahem,

U MAD

]]> By: cortesdiddy http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/07/16/the-china-study-my-response-to-campbell/#comment-19560 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:30:40 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/?p=404#comment-19560 As if I needed another example of Wikipedia editors destroying all the foundations[dubious-discuss] and principles [which?] which that site allegedly works under[NPOV!!!]

Thank you for your work, Denise. I appreciate it.

]]> By: Ed http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/07/16/the-china-study-my-response-to-campbell/#comment-17389 Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:38:04 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/?p=404#comment-17389 Denise was not born in 1987. She mentions “…first thing in the morning when I look like the lovechild of Cousin It and the Swamp Thing)

Do you know anyone younger than 30 that even knows who cousin It or Swamp thing is?

Fishy.

]]> By: Minger Responds to Campbell | General Diseases | All Medical Information http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/07/16/the-china-study-my-response-to-campbell/#comment-17360 Sun, 08 Jan 2012 01:36:20 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/?p=404#comment-17360 [...] The China Study: My Response to Campbell [...]

]]> By: T. Colin Campbell | who-they-are http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/07/16/the-china-study-my-response-to-campbell/#comment-16644 Sun, 01 Jan 2012 02:47:20 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/?p=404#comment-16644 [...] Minger’s response to Campbell. [...]

]]> By: База жителей СНГ онлайн http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/07/16/the-china-study-my-response-to-campbell/#comment-16597 Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:41:48 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/?p=404#comment-16597 База жителей СНГ онлайн…

[...]The China Study: My Response to Campbell « Raw Food SOS: Troubleshooting on the Raw Food Diet[...]…

]]> By: Sharon Burress http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/07/16/the-china-study-my-response-to-campbell/#comment-16539 Fri, 30 Dec 2011 21:07:26 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/?p=404#comment-16539 I know the China Study was flawed and you are correct in your analysis, but Campbell was right in stating that your use of adjectives and, yes, adverbs demonstrated something other than simply reporting facts and refuting conclusions. The use of these modifiers revealed attitude, if not bias. As an English major, I am pretty sure you know that is right. Facts don’t need modifiers, generally speaking, and their use, while making for better readability, dilutes the starkness of the facts. I do agree with your analysis of his work, however.

]]> By: Texan http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/07/16/the-china-study-my-response-to-campbell/#comment-15260 Tue, 20 Dec 2011 22:18:59 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/?p=404#comment-15260 I like how on this post, you leave out (www.beefandwhisky.com) on your name…..didnt want to seem like a hypocrite calling someone else a zealot? This whole blog is crap and is an obvious attack at Campbell and his work. And if its not, then wheres the parts about where he was right about this or that, or where others were wrong? Never have I seen a forum where SOOO many people are so quick to agree and praise someones opinion. Oh yeah thats right….she deletes posts that point out where shes wrong and blames it on some spam filter. And to try to make Campbell out to be someone trying to hide something simply because he wont go “fetch” all his work hes done over the past 40yrs, or 300+ research papers is ridiculous, hes a busy man and unlike “Denise” he doesnt have hours upon hours of free time all day, every day. Why should he bother anyways? Because some internet blogger requests them? Why doesnt she just go find them herself, she obviously has the time to? Thanks for reaffirming that people are so hell bent on gorging themselves with animal protein that they will go to whatever measures to discredit those speaking out against it and find ways to make themselves feel better about the decisions they have already made. Ive never heard of a Dr. telling someone they eat to many veggies, but meat?…Oh yeah! Thats evidence enough for me….Denise, I have to agree with Mr.Vegetables here, people like YOU and all your little followers are the problem! You have no interest in helping people or shedding light on facts just instigating confusion and finding fault in a brilliant mans life work. How juvenille.

]]> By: Minger Responds to Campbell « Mojume http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/07/16/the-china-study-my-response-to-campbell/#comment-15226 Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:26:35 +0000 http://rawfoodsos.com/?p=404#comment-15226 [...] The China Study: My Response to Campbell [...]

]]>